|
Cover |
Journal of Global Positioning Systems
Vol. 8, No. 2, 2009
ISSN 1446-3156 (Print Version)
ISSN 1446-3164 (CD Version)
See PDF file
|
|
JGPS Team Structure, Copyright and Table of Contents |
JGPS Team Structure, Copyright
See PDF file
Table of Contents
See PDF file
|
|
1. Three Carrier Ambiguity Resolutions: Generalised Problems, Models and Solutions |
Yanming Feng(1) and Bofeng Li(1, 2)
(1)Faculty of Science and Technology, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane Q4001, Australia
(2)Department of Surveying and Geo-informatics Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
See Abstract and
PDF file
In this paper, the problems of three carrier phase ambiguity resolution (TCAR) and position estimation (PE) are generalised as
real time GNSS data processing problems for a continuously observing network on large scale. In order to describe these problems,
a general linear equation system is presented to uniform various geometry-free, geometry-based and geometry-constrained TCAR models,
along with state transition questions between observation times. With this general formulation, generalised TCAR solutions are given
to cover different real time GNSS data processing scenarios, and various simplified integer solutions, such as geometry-free rounding
and geometry-based LAMBDA solutions with single and multiple -epoch measurements. In fact, various ambiguity resolution (AR) solutions
differ in the floating ambiguity estimation and integer ambiguity search processes, but their theoretical equivalence remains under the
same observational systems models and statistical assumptions. TCAR performance benefits as outlined from the data analyses in some
recent literatures are reviewed, showing profound implications for the future GNSS development from both technology and application perspectives.
|
|
2. A Complexity Reduced Frequency Domain Receiver for Galileo and GPS L1 Signals |
Feng Xu and Yang Gao
Department of Geomatics Engineering, The University of Calgary
See Abstract and
PDF file
The L1/E1 band will soon be populated with four different signals, namely the GPS L1 CA code, L1C code, Galileo E1B code and E1C code.
The frequency domain receiver, which can provide parallel correlation and process all the signals in a common structure, becomes a
promising solution for multi-code and multi-modulation processing. However, the conventional frequency domain receivers require quite
high computational capacity to perform the FFT and IFFT operations, especially when the receivers operate at a high sampling rate.
The high computational complexity would exert a negative effect on the size, power consumption, and cost of the receiver.
To reduce the computational complexities of the frequency domain receiver, a new correlation method with signal down sampling in the
frequency domain is proposed in this paper. The down sampling is achieved by pruning the high frequency parts of the signal spectrum
and then performing IFFT in a smaller size. The correlation gain loss will be small because the pruned spectrums contain little energy.
The results show that the correlation gain losses of BPSK (1) and BOC (1,1) are less than 0.4dB with a sampling rate of 16.384MHz, while
the operations in the IFFTs can be reduced to 40% of the conventional method with original sampling rate of 40MHz. And because the IFFTs
are the most computationally consuming parts in the frequency domain receiver, the new method can significantly reduce the computational
load by reducing the IFFT size.
In addition, because the closed code delay tracking loop cannot be applied in the frequency domain receivers directly, a correlation
interpolation method, which can produce the EPL correlation as in the time domain receiver, is then usually applied in the existing
frequency domain receivers. But the interpolation method will lead to extra operations. In this paper, a novel open loop code delay
estimation method without correlation interpolation is also proposed. The method first obtains the integer parts of the code delay
by the correlation peak detection, then gets the residual errors by code delay discrimination and finally obtains the precise estimation
by post filtering. The results indicate that this new method not only reduces the complexity, but also improves the tracking sensitivity
comparing to the conventional closed tracking loops.
|
|
3. Performance Evaluation of Combined L1/L5 Kalman Filter-Based Tracking versus Standalone
L1/L5 Tracking in Challenging Environments |
Dina Reda Salem, Cillian O’Driscoll and Gérard Lachapelle
Position, Location And Navigation (PLAN) Group, Department of Geomatics Engineering
Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary
See Abstract and
PDF file
The ever-increasing demand on GPS to perform in challenging environments is the main motivation behind this research. With the
existence of these challenging environments, more research is directed towards enhancing the tracking capabilities. Several
solutions have been proposed to enable high sensitivity tracking using only one signal. However, new GPS signals are now available,
in addition to the conventional L1 signal. Being transmitted from the same space vehicle through the same environment, the errors
between these signals are correlated. Hence, an increase in tracking sensitivity can be achieved by combining two or more of these
signals. This paper proposes the idea of combining the L1 and L5 signals using one Kalman filter, where the correlator outputs of
the two signals are used to estimate the tracking errors. The performance of this combined Kalman filter is compared to a similar
Kalman filter that is used separately for tracking each of the two signals. The performance of both filters is compared in environments
suffering urban canyon multipath, moderate ionospheric errors, in addition to a motion model of a typical vehicle. The combined Kalman
filter is shown to outperform the separate Kalman filter, both in the tracking errors and in the filter statistics.
|
|
4. Extended GNSS Ambiguity Resolution Models with Regularization Criterion and Constraints |
Bofeng Li(1, 2), Yanming Feng(2) and Yunzhong Shen(1)
(1)Department of Surveying and Geo-informatics Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
(2)School of Information Technology, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane Q4001, Australia
See Abstract and
PDF file
This paper firstly presents an extended ambiguity resolution model that deals with an ill-posed problem and constraints among the
estimated parameters. In the extended model, the regularization criterion is used instead of the traditional least squares in order
to estimate the float ambiguities better. The existing models can be derived from the general model. Secondly, the paper examines the
existing ambiguity searching methods from four aspects: exclusion of nuisance integer candidates based on the available integer
constraints; integer rounding; integer bootstrapping and integer least squares estimations. Finally, this paper systematically addresses
the similarities and differences between the generalized TCAR and decorrelation methods from both theoretical and practical aspects.
|
|
5. Differences in Accuracies and Fitting Surface Planes of Two Error Models for NRTK in GPSnet |
Suqin Wu, Kefei Zhang and David Silcock
(School of Mathematics and Geospatial Science, RMIT University, Australia
See Abstract and
PDF file
In the past years, several regional error models for the network RTK (NRTK) approach have been proposed, investigated and used. Most
of the studies are based on one single model to test the model’s performance in a reference network or a few reference networks. Very
limited research has been conducted to evaluate performance differences of different error models in the same network using the same
test dataset. It is difficulty to predict which of the models will outperform the others for a specific network since different reference
networks have different error characteristics. For example, the multipath effect (or the station specific error), the spatial atmospheric
pattern, and the scale of the ionospheric disturbance may be different in different networks. These factors may cause differences in
performance among different error models.
Among the existing error models for NRTK, the linear interpolation model (LIM) and the low-order surface model (LSM) are typical and most
often discussed/used. In this paper, the difference in the accuracies of the interpolated residuals in GPSnet from the two models are compared
using several test cases with three different observation sessions combined with various network configurations. The snapshots of the fitting
surface planes derived from the two models at the same epochs are also compared as well. Test results indicate that the LSM in some cases
performed significantly poorer than the LIM. In this case, the snapshots of the two fitting surface planes from the two models present the
error’s correlation trend significantly different.
|
|
6. Analysis of Ionospheric Range Delay Corrections for Navigation in South American Low-Latitude Regions |
Amalia M. Meza(1) and Laura I. Fernández(2)
(1)Facultad de Cs. Astronómicas y Geofísicas, Universidad de La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
(2)Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, CONICET, Argentina
See Abstract and
PDF file
Ionospheric conditions for South American low- and mid-latitude scenarios are simulated. The performance of an ionospheric correction
algorithm on positioning is analysed for this region. This correction is of similar nature to the Satellite Based Augmentation System
(SBAS) type algorithm. The mismodelling produced by each ionospheric simulated approximation can be separately quantified: 1) the single
layer shell representation of the ionosphere and 2) the simple geometric mapping function. The effects of both components on positioning
are evaluated and discussed for periods with different levels of ionospheric activity: winter, summer, and austral spring equinox. The
results show that the mapping function is the most important contributor to the ionospheric error. Its effect on the height component is
the most important. Besides, on north and east components, the principal error contributor is the Vertical Total Electron Content (VTEC)
mismodelling. The application was also tested on real data during a spring equinox of a mid-low solar activity year (2005) and the results
are similar and coherent with those obtained using simulated data.
|
|
7. Application of Mixed-radix FFT Algorithms in Multi-band GNSS Signal Acquisition Engines |
Nagaraj C Shivaramaiah, Andrew G Dempster and Chris Rizos
School of Surveying and Spatial Information Systems, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
See Abstract and
PDF file
Due to their fast operation, Fast Fourier Transform (FFT)-based coarse signal synchronization methods are an attractive option for Global
Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receiver baseband signal processing. However, there are several reasons why the utility of FFT-based
methods is dependent on understanding the trade-off between synchronization speed and the required processing power. Firstly, the new
signals of the GNSS family, for instance Galileo and GPS modernization, employ longer period Pseudo Random Noise (PRN) codes and higher
signal bandwidths, which demand FFTs of large transform lengths. Secondly, to gain an advantage in positioning performance, next generation
receivers target multiple GNSS signals, and since each signal has its own code length (and hence a minimum sampling frequency), the receiver
should accommodate FFT blocks of varying lengths. This paper discusses the requirements of FFT-based algorithms for such a multi-band receiver
and analyzes the application of prime-factor and mixed-radix FFT algorithms. A novel way of factorizing different transform lengths into
smaller transforms and then combining these smaller-point FFTs to compute the larger required FFTs is described. It is shown that the use
of the proposed architecture reduces the computational load (or processor cycles) and increases the re-usability of the acquisition search
engine to process different signals.
|
|
Technical Notes |
Technical Notes
See Abstract and
PDF file
"Technical Notes" is a regular column in this Journal, featuring reviews of technical or theoretical tools for topics of positioning systems
and their applications. Specialists in various fields are welcome to contribute a normal article to outline the issues of interest as systematic
possible. In general, the manuscripts may aim to fill the gaps between the textbooks and scientific papers published for the specific topic.
In this issue, Dr Eun-Hwan Shin, Applanix Corp., will discuss the Sigma Point-Based Estimation, focusing on the sigma point-based filter and
smoother for a generic discrete time nonlinear system model in navigation and positioning applications.
The column of this issue is coordinated by Dr Jianguo Wang, who appreciates your contribution to this column, along with your comments or ideas
for topics for future issues (jgwang@yorku.ca).
|
|
8. Technical Notes on Sigma-Point-Based Estimation |
Eun-Hwan Shin
85 Leek Crescent, Richmond Hill Ontario, Canada
See Abstract and
PDF file
Discussed in this paper are the sigma point-based filter and smoother for a generic discrete-time nonlinear system model. The sigma-point filter
is treated as an approximation of the generic nonlinear Kalman filter equations, which extends the chapter on nonlinear Kalman filter theory
in Gelb (1974). The implementation of the square-root sigma-point filter is addressed in detail with the necessary numerical tools so that it
can easily be used for practical use. The Rauch-Tung-Striebel (RTS) formulation of the sigma-point smoother is derived by combining the
statistical linear regression and the optimization criteria given in Rauch et al. (1965). The notes can be used as a supplementary reading
material in an introductory nonlinear estimationcourse.
|
|
|
Corporate Members of CPGPS |
Corporate Members of CPGPS
See PDF file
|
|
Instructions to Authors |
Instructions to Authors
See PDF file
|
|
CPGPS Team Structure |
CPGPS Management Team (2009) Structure
See PDF file
|
|
© CPGPS, 2008. All the rights reserved.
Last Modified: March, 2010
|